Contents (some)

Online parts amount to only 1%-5% of the actual report with references removed; the more valuable sections are found only in the actual paid-for reports and Master Protocol.

[For the web, some words have had to be replaced with blanks. The printed copy for those who buy the actual report contains the actual words without editing or blanks.]

Part I: Update to Enclosed Heart Disease Report - Excerpts Now Online below

Treating The Immediate Condition: - Excerpts Now Online below

Correction of Deficiencies That Lead To The Condition / Further Therapies

...

5) Others including kinesiological / energy balances & corrections that work in minutes

Erroneous & Well-Rationalized Use of Statistics - online below

- aspirin causes strokes

- the color of both pills & contents

- studies designed to do little more than hide aspartame's

- any & all studies used to support AZT

- the percentage of drugs, & pills period that are contaminated

- salt

It Does Not Matter How Genuinely Stupid The Misdirection Is - online below

- cholesterol restriction

- exercise is irrelevant

- studies used to "see what people want to see" & popularize vegetarianism

- garlic is now said

- enough autopsies of fatal heart attack victims have existed



Heart Disease Not a Killer - The Creation of Problems / Industries Where None Need Exist Is - online below

Ultimate Chemical Protocol For Heart & Related Disease - Excerpts Now Online below

Dental Cause

Reversing Previous Damage - Oxygen Therapy

Two Things Much More Effective Than CPR

Book Ratings and References

Part II: Result of Unnatural Dependence on Approval of Others:

A Contextually Correct Rational Response to Solicitor of Heart Transplant Donations

Context of This Report Explained In No Uncertain Terms [!]

Some topics include:

...

4) Properly applied dietary restriction

5) Anti-Oxidants:

JUST HOW POWERFUL ARE ANTI-OXIDANTS?

...

7) Dr. Atkin's No Carbohydrate Diet:

8) Irrelevance & Danger of Exercise:

...

10) First Aid:

...

12) More effective methods:

References:

Part III: Supplements to Result of Unnatural Dependence on Approval of Others:

Facts and Context of this Cardiomyopathy Patient's Condition

...

Excerpt From A Letter To This Patient

...

...

Will ....... Extend Your Life? Should You Be .......?

Update to Enclosed Heart Disease Report

[Private research/development I use on myself only - no medical recommendation, prescription, advice, treatment, diagnosis, or training is attempted or given in the text below. What you decide to do with the below is "your research" for which I cannot be held responsible; all readers/users of below agree to this paragraph and to the standard disclaimer below starting "I In No Way Hint" or they discontinue reading now. Only those that fully & completely agree to this paragraph, the below disclaimer, and all disclaimers on this web site, should read further or even think about using any of the therapies mentioned below.]

March 1999

The report that follows this update was originally written a decade ago, well before the media caught on to the value of nutrient supplementation. It was also written well before M.D.'s in general began their self-promotion campaigns marketing their own "doctor-approved" brands.

Doctor approved / endorsed supplements universally, or virtually so, constitute a joke - especially when they involve M.D.'s (unoriginal, zero net value to previously existing brands [or formulas], overpriced, ripped-off mass-marketing-hype farces* designed to capitalize on mass-ignorance / dependence / external-authority searches.

(*A farce here = waiting for other people to do something first, ignoring them, discrediting them, mocking them for decades or as long as can be gotten away with - then copying them and "stealing the glory". When ignoring / discrediting any longer becomes dangerous to reputation and when the concept of ingesting the raw materials needed to maintain physical existence in a disease-free state becomes socially acceptable, then and only then do we see doctors and others "catching on".) (I have no glory to steal - I'm not in that business; being independent, I can just say things the way they are.) (And of course, I've never made one cent off any supplement or pill since I don't involve myself in that.)

These laughable marketing-ploys by doctors are blatant attempts to set themselves up as "FDA[ / "God"] substitutes" and give some now politically/socially/trade-union-acceptable air of (in this context totally unearned, false) "approval" about the nutrient. The misnomer "nutraceutical" is a similar attempt. ¹. As a predictable result, every single M.D. "approved" brand I've witnessed, irrespective the "approval-based" claim made, invariably has been of lower quality [than those I will use], poorly designed, poorly packaged, and/or inadequately tested even for contaminants as per Clark and recent verifying expensive mainstream technology. [All these inadequacies relative to those I will use.] Even if the topic is limited to chemical substances, the very last thing the typical M.D. / drug company wants to admit to is the mass-pollution present in pills / supplements as identified by Clark and now verified elsewhere. Even if the ingredients in some of the popular brands somehow aren't contaminated prior to packaging, a big IF, the manufacturer can typically default into mass-marketed problem-creation, refuse to spend money on decent bottles / seals and let the packaging itself contaminate the product. These brands are thus little better than a "drug company" or "FDA Brand" "nutraceutical".

[Theoretically, there may indeed be an acceptable quality doctor-approved supplement brand. And one day, one reader somewhere may find a good one. But I haven't seen it, and having no more time to waste, my search is now officially discontinued. The formula & listed ingredients are basically irrelevant: anyone can throw anything together. It doesn't matter who or what endorses it. The contamination, the packing, the bottling/manufacturing processes, the quality (of everything, not just the active ingredients), the seal, the bottle, and any nitrogen-flushing, etc. are what determine the value and if it is even useable by the body at all compared to the pure uncontaminated substance in its proper form. Many supplements on the market are little more than toxins unusable by the body (see Clark and others).]

¹a subversion of the concept of "nutrient" and an attempt to gain control and manipulate via neo-cheating (force / context-dropping, etc.). A nutrient naturally found in food is hard to regulate. A pharmaceutical on the other hand is something that sends neo-cheating bureaucrats salivating. It begs for regulation. And so does a "nutraceutical". The right nutrient or combination thereof in the right form, when pure & unpolluted, and properly taken in the proper dose is powerful enough. Return to main text.

The concept of "alternative medicine" is equally a farce. These reports are about "rational" medicine. There are many alternative (and conventional) therapies, but only a few take precedence over all others based on their results.

There are many therapies that can help cardiovascular disease. This report is not about them however. It only concerns itself with the best of them. There are many others, but they are not in the same league of effects. This report's scope is limited however to chemical therapies. Electrical & other non-chemical therapies are fundamentally superior to chemical in their results (see Master Protocol). The basics and place to start are here however. "Better therapies" will not substitute for deficiency diseases in those literally dying of them (as is the case in much if not all heart & vascular disease). Both the original cause of the disease and electro-medicine along with the other aspects revealed in the Master Protocol need addressed.

See "Context of This Report Explained In No Uncertain Terms" as found in the beginning of the actual report which follows this update. It is to be kept in mind when reading anything I write here, there, or anywhere else on the subject.

Cardiomyopathy / congestive heart failure is in the vast majority, if not all cases, the logical end result of conventional / approval seeking medicine becoming involved with a simple nutritional deficiency. Analysis of these final stage conditions provide the key for understanding the successful treatment and prevention of heart / vascular disease period (angina, high blood pressure, stroke, heart attack, blocked arteries, oxidized cholesterol, homocysteine, irregular heartbeat, palpitations, hardening of the arteries, etc.).

The strategy employed by medical neocheaters is to ignore for as long as possible the deficiency, lie to the patient, prescribe toxic, even heart-weakening drugs to attempt to cover up the symptoms for as long as possible until the patient needs an immediate "new heart" due to medical neglect, and then "come to rescue" with a heart transplant (if the patient is not too old and he and his insurance "deserve" it). It occurs typically after conventional medicine-caused blocked arteries and heart attacks "kill" portions of the heart muscle to the point it can no longer function.

The heart transplant is the end result of cardiovascular disease and the cause is medical neglect. Specifically, the M.D.-caused condition is a deficiency of selenium. Even when not thought to be, it is probably aggravated by it. Copper deficiency may also contribute. It may also be viewed as a deficiency of Co-enzyme Q10 and possibly other simple nutrients proven to reverse the condition below.

This is not just me saying this; you can also find out the same information "popularized" (in this context) by ____, _____, and even ____. These simple deficiencies set the stage for lowered immunity and subsequent damage directly attributed to infections of the heart muscle², alcohol and other toxins. Alcohol and other toxins in turn inhibit nutrient absorption & utilization and create deficiencies and the seeds for disease³.

² Pathogens such as viral infections do not successfully attack healthy tissue - they cannot live, and especially not thrive enough to "cause" a transplant, in a healthy environment natural to the human body. This is evidenced by the work of Hulda Clark and the various practitioners of the biological terrain theory. Disease is not caused by microbes that "happen to be nearby" and suddenly attack at their collective whim or by random chance - there is a reason why they grow in certain locations. That reason is the fundamental cause of the disease not the microbes themselves. See "The Fully-Integrated Answer To Disease, Part I".

³ Still, as of 1999, instead of supplying deficient nutrients or even properly measuring for deficiencies of the various and many raw materials needed for continued existence, the patient is told simply "to get off alcohol", or "take these antibiotics", or "lose weight and eat right". (Losing weight and eating right will never supply the patient the amount of deficient nutrients in the current condition [although butter may be very high in selenium for those who haven't been scared into avoiding beneficial saturated fats]). In actions and prescriptions, as opposed to comforting words spoken almost as afterthoughts used to encourage returning clients when deemed necessary, this must surely be the prevailing attitude of 9/10ths or more of all M.D.'s. (Have they learned nothing in the last 20-30 years? Has the public learned more than they have? Or does their economic continuation require they do not learn and that above all, within socially-acceptable standards, that they do not successfully treat??) Drugs are of course added to attempt to cover-up symptoms for as long as possible. These "prescriptions" then have the effect, whether consciously intended or not, of keeping the "income-source" coming back and racking up bills, which the patient then gleefully "pays" with "insurance". What is "accomplished" is little or nothing but the creation of problems where none need or already exist.

Is this medicine? Obviously it is not. It is simple neglect. [Actually, if the amount of selenium present in butter claimed by some sources is correct, cardiomyopathy / congestive heart failure - the end result of heart / cardiovascular disease (if the patient survives the initial heart attacks & strokes, little or no thanks to conventional medicine) may be a deficiency of butterfat (100 or more grams a day) - a deficiency of (one of the correct types of) saturated fat (selenium) and perhaps ground beef (not usual kind, but properly prepared - L-carnitine). Those who've fallen victim to the "fat is bad" propaganda need to read Dr. Atkins various books. Diets high in fat are not bad and, in particular for heart disease, very beneficial. (All this presumes the diet is actually FOLLOWED as spelled out in his various books and nutritional deficiencies are corrected. Attempts to justify laziness and smear the concept behind a fat-based diet are childish, irrelevant, and easily ignored by those following his diet who know the difference.) Diets high in both carbohydrates and fat are what's dangerous (and fattening): the human body can essentially only burn one or other at any given time - fats or carbohydrates. It's when they're mixed in sufficient amounts that trouble ensues, overweight being the first sign.

The U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (under Dr. Klevay) has established animal studies previously touted to conclude fat intake as the cause of heart disease were misleading and that the real culprit was a copper deficiency. There has never been a study in humans (or warm blooded mammals in any way known applicable to humans) that correctly pinpoints fat intake as the cause of heart disease. There have been a lot that irrationally blame fat intake, but their high fat diets were really also high* carbohydrate diets all in one (asking for trouble) and/or were actually caused by lack of a known essential nutrient whose deficiency is already well-established to lead to heart disease. (* = High carbohydrate for that amount of fat.)]

Heart disease, high or abnormal blood sugar and insulin levels, and diabetes are closely related. The Atkins diet successfully prevents and treats all these conditions.

As evidenced in the reversals of the disease with simple supplementation, it is a virtual certainty that if the deficiencies are taken away, then the infections, toxins, and usually blamed "causes" will not damage the heart enough to require "transplantation". Regardless the quoted "cause" of cardiomyopathy, simple supplementation works. If, however, medical mysticism is allowed to prevail, simple supplementation is neglected and the real cause of the congestive heart failure / cardiomyopathy is not addressed, by the time talk of a transplant begins "as potentially the only option", the trap has already sprung. It may be too late in that case to expect a complete recovery with supplements alone. (See Master Protocol).

If supplements are prescribed, beware of the favorite trick of many M.D.s: the insufficient dose ploy - this is becoming an increasingly effective means of "creating a transplant where none exists" when public knowledge of the cause of the disease / role of deficiencies is on the rise. The effects are the same as being given "the silent treatment": huge amounts of money change hands and there is a transplant. Correction of deficiencies is essential in all stages of the disease, however in the later stages more powerful therapies have their advantages and are probably necessary to even rationally attempt to ensure survival (in any way approaching as best as possible) sans transplant. (See Master Protocol).

Any heart, artery, or blood pressure treatment with less than a 90-100% rate of complete prevention and almost certainly the same rate of "complete long-term / permanent remission from all symptoms" (if caught in time before too much unnecessary damage is allowed to be done) - or one with toxic or undesirable side effects - is inadequate and mystical (the creation of problems where none exist).

To the chagrin of those who make a living as professional context-droppers, meaning is both definition and context. First then, the standard disclaimer: "Context of This Report Explained In No Uncertain Terms"

"I in no way hint - as some people like to "interpret" - that any of the therapies listed herein should be taken blindly without a good reason or by questionable self-diagnosis. In no way do I recommend ANYONE blindly use any of these therapies without 1) a good reason and 2) proper medical supervision. These treatments, while the most non-toxic of any generally available should be used to treat or prevent a specific condition they have already shown effectiveness against (or are thought to be useful against in extreme circumstances).

Despite the title of some of the books, the therapies are neither "miracles" nor "cure all's" to be used irrationally, blindly, or stupidly. FULLY KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING BEFORE YOU DO IT. (Otherwise, you - not me - are taking the meaning of this report completely out of context!)

What follows is a simplified listing of usually ignored treatment options NOT specific recommendations or medical advice. Anyone considering use of the therapies herein should consult the references as well as a competent medical doctor prior to any use.

This publication is written, sold and should be read with the understanding that: 1) the author and publisher do not engage in specific medical recommendations, prescriptions, advice, diagnosis, treatment, or training, 2) the author and publisher will be held harmless for any results or believed results of a readers use or misuse, understanding, or mis-understanding, of enclosed and all related information, 3) the reader acts entirely of his own responsibility in using information herein, and 4) even though meticulously researched and written to ensure accuracy and completeness of information herein, the information may not be infallible and therefore no responsibility for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will be assumed by the publisher or author.

**Promises or guarantees, implied or otherwise, of cures, or even of relieved symptoms in the reader / user are categorically not being made although remissions and total symptom relief have been proven in the past in other people. These are (research) "methods" whether self researched (including administered) or not. Methods are methods: they are not guarantees and are only designed to give the maximum possible chance of a future event occurring in the opinion of the designer. This is not medical advice: for that, at least one (preferably unbiased) qualified medical practitioner should be consulted. See # 3 in Lifespan Report to understand this more & why this is called research - especially under subtitles "Use of These Reports", & "Basis of Reading / Treatment"



If this disclaimer is not completely understood, discontinue reading here."

Without engaging in medical advice, just quoting the "opinion of a researcher" and results of research that need tailored to each person along with and monitored by an unbiased M.D. (medical doctor), in the context of rational "self-experimentation", if I were suffering from cardiomyopathy / congestive heart failure / high blood pressure, or any remotely similar condition, it would be absolutely imperative (for me) to immediately take effective doses of the following. (The exception would be unless allergic / sensitive to the brand or for some other reason like a diet already high in selenium / copper.) (I would not take fiber around the same time as any of the substances, nor would I eat much of it anyway, as fiber can easily decrease absorption.) (The below can dramatically reduce need for blood pressure and other medications QUICKLY, hence proper monitoring of BP (blood pressure), condition, and toxicity of drugs & conventional treatment is essential):

Treating The Immediate Condition:

- In the right dosage, under the supervision of a competent and knowledgeable M.D. -

Oral strophanthin (ouabain), a powerful compound which must be used properly, normalizes the pH of the heart muscle and has made at least fatal heart attacks and further significant heart damage impossible in 15,000+ heart disease sufferers. This would be among the very first chemical substances I'd consume if I had the slightest reason to think I were developing let alone had cardiovascular disease - possibly even high blood pressure. (Note however, "too much" of it can be taken unlike most of the nutrients listed herein.) Fundamentally, the cause of, or "terrain needed" by any disease is an abnormal pH (acid-alkaline balance). When this is localized, the disease is localized. Overall body pH can be normal, but if the heart muscle is diseased or a tumor is present, the pH will be acidic in the localized region affected. In the case of a heart attack, the most fundamental cause is not a blocked artery or lack of oxygen flow to the heart - it is an acidic pH whether or not blocked arteries, etc. are a factor in forming the localized acidic environment. (And in most to, more probably, all cases, blocked arteries, even when they do occur are probably irrelevant since secondary arteries take over on their own for the blocked arteries before any therapy including surgery can possibly cause "remission". Enlargement of secondary arteries is natural and keeps the blood flowing to the heart making it impossible for blocked arteries to be the real cause of heart attacks. [One of many things you're not supposed to hear when large incomes, entire "specialties" & professions are on the line. But don't bury yourself in the references just yet - there's more...])

Heart attacks come on suddenly. Over 75% of all heart attacks are "silent" - painless. Even angina can be "silent". Half of all people having a sudden heart attack die before reaching medical assistance. Hence, when relying on chemical substances, the herb strophanthin would be my first choice - with the above precautions.

Another primary treatment is listed at the end of this update under "Ultimate Chemical Protocol".

... [regarding selenium] Most "experts" scare the public, especially heart disease, cancer, AIDS, and infectious disease patients into taking an insufficient dose due to talk of selenium's theoretical toxicity. The level at which toxic symptoms become apparent can vary greatly of course, and this does not mean people should be careless about the dose and non-observant of toxicity signs, but chronic total daily doses from all food & supplements of under 900 mcg are virtually free of reports of toxicity. Hair / fingernail loss, garlic, sour, or metallic breath / sweat / taste, vomiting / nausea, irritability, emotional problems, fatigue, and liver or kidney dysfunction are symptoms of toxicity...

... [regarding copper] Aside from plant derived colloidal copper (hard to take in necessary doses), copper ____ is the best form to take and is an anti-oxidant (other forms are pro-oxidants). This form is not harmful or useless like standard forms of copper in reasonable amounts [this is not referring to artificial copper-chlorophyll compounds used as dyes]...

... 400 times more powerful than flax oil, and 200-350 times more powerful than other essential fatty acids is a patented _____ (This can dramatically reduce inflammation according to Australian university studies.)

Kinesiology is called for to test for allergic reactions to supplements/ pills/ any & all therapies every day.

See ____ for simple kinesiological / energy balances & corrections that can greatly help to prevent and treat heart disease. Blood pressure and other symptoms have been reduced in minutes.

Darkfield microscopy is essential (see Master Protocol).

... If I were not already using & taking the above, and I were in the above condition, there would be no attempt being made to treat my condition and there would be a virtual guarantee of it resulting in disaster. (Treated = to successful conclusion.)

Again, this is not anything any specific person should do - other than myself, understanding the above, and somehow finding myself in the above condition.

Heart transplants are a direct and typical result of the failure of the patient to take supplemental selenium (and the above) and correct deficiencies in the early stages of the disease as well as less (300-400 mcg/day) prior on a preventive basis. If "not" selenium in all cases, then strophanthin, Co-Q10, and the others listed here. Although better, easier and quicker-acting treatments exist identified in the Master Protocol, there is thought to be zero need for a transplant OR a heart attack, at least of the fatal or debilitating variety, if all the chemical options listed herein are utilized in time. Possibly, only some of the substances listed herein are necessary but that's a gamble and less safe.

The relationship between selenium and cancer (and possibly AIDS) is even more dramatic than it is for heart disease and stroke. However, it has been estimated for 18 years, since 1981, that a mere 200-300 mcg/day of selenium (in supplements and diet) can prevent up to 60%-70% of both heart disease and cancer cases. Does this mean 70% have been averted or that it has even been prescribed? You should know better...

Lifespan Report quotes relevant to heart disease (all indented; expanded on further down). Especially note the section near indentation end regarding autopsies of so-called heart attack victims. The ultimate chemical protocol follows:

'Erroneous & Well-Rationalized Use of Statistics

Many published studies are useful & valuable & the "concept" alone of them is good. However, despite needed reversals & claims to the contrary, many if not most popularized media-reported published peer-reviewed 'sound-good' / 'feel-good'-to-the-masses double-blind socially-acceptable (& "coincidentally" socially / vested interests-funded AND reviewed) studies can easily be interpreted any way the study designers / "funders" / "sponsors" want them interpreted. And time is not wasted by "sponsors", etc. doing "unneeded" studies. (Outright fraud, statistic-tampering, context-dropping, & "kick-back"-receiving are also prevalent far more than reported in published studies.) Statistics can be used to justify & say nearly anything, and in the perhaps 1%-10% of the time when that's not possible, they can easily be invented. Misdirection is easy, routine, & to be expected, by those with vested interests. A few obvious examples are:

- aspirin causes strokes - does not significantly prevent strokes or heart attacks (taking aspirin is accurately described as "going on a witch hunt" as far as the true cause of heart disease is concerned). The beneficial effect could clearly be just as much or probably more due to the magnesium used to buffer the aspirin's acidity in the studies - and in fact, that is an established effect of magnesium. Because magnesium was "an ill-understood mere mineral" and a "blind spot" for the masses, it constituted the prefect candidate for use as the buffering agent, whether it was unconsciously or consciously chosen with that in mind (very probable) or merely done "unwittingly".

- the color of both pills & contents (various forms of processed sugars, contaminants, colors, flavors, and allergic substances) used as placebos can in Reality render the "control" non-existent as well as the effect of the substance supposedly being studied impossible to discern. The "theoretical / stated" purpose of a double-blind study is to measure the effect of something versus the placebo: what the public is not told is that such things as allergies and color therapy exist, are widespread (like pollution in pills), and in the case of purposely ill-understood color therapy, work (to anyone who has objectively tested them) (Dinshah, Douglass, etc.). This rendering of controls meaningless is obvious when x number of studies are interpreted to mean one thing, that same thing is then promoted to the public for years, then the public begins to be told the opposite / that it was all a mistake - e.g. cholesterol avoidance, egg avoidance, meat avoidance, blood cholesterol reliably implicated in the development of heart disease, etc. After years, decades of using statistics to promote one "imaginative view", the obvious is then stated / "interpreted" in later statistical studies decades after the facts are first known (& not publicized or attacked with disinformation & misdirection if they are at all) when it becomes desirable for the interpreter (to move on to other, greener justifications of "fanciful flights of imagination" / context-drops / the former "can't be hidden" any longer). This is routine.

A move is now being made to make cyclamates "politically correct / acceptable" in the form of nice FDA, etc. (involuntary) contributions - decades after the initial context-drops used on it. It may be contaminated with solvents, etc. just like sugar, but that is not the point. a) Sugar shortens lifespan & is extremely destructive, & b) via focusing and objectivity, properly-applied rational self-guidance - NT - is the only way for the individual to see through and avoid such socially-acceptable widespread destructions & the artificially shortened lifespans that "come along for the ride".

- studies designed to do little more than hide aspartame's negative effects (they are simply lost, edited, & then of course forgotten). Aspartame is thought to cause "holes" in animals brains & have a wide variety of side effects in normal people in widely used doses. It is also made with & contains methanol (wood alcohol), a known poison.

- any & all studies used to support AZT / standard AIDS drug use including new unthinkable "cocktails" of extremely toxic AIDS drugs - Why? Because they can be prescribed & sold. Not one of them has increased the life of AIDS patients by a single day (aside from their toxic, literally AIDS-causing effects, equally aside from their probable contamination - see Clark).

- the percentage of drugs, & pills period that are contaminated with minute amounts of extremely toxic substances such as mercury, benzene, rubbing / wood alcohol, & toxic plasticizers, probably from manufacturing / packaging processes, is so high according to the proper use of the Clark device that not only are they unsafe generally, but could render the results of even a beneficial substance a hit or miss roulette game - whether used in published studies or personal use. (Note that millions if not more die annually from two things: a) failure to focus & lack of objectivity, & b) basic nutritional deficiencies. Diet alone is not a reliable source no matter how well planned or executed. Nutrient supplements are good, beneficial, & necessary, however that only applies to the concept of it - the application is far more difficult.)

- salt (sodium) is insignificant to high blood pressure, heart or artery disease although a salt deficiency may cause cardiovascular disease, premature aging, and certainly death. Most people are salt deficient eating what are popularly called high salt / sodium foods. Popular refined sodium chloride used in virtually all processed and restaurant food is not "salt": it does not satisfy the body's need for salt (or sodium) but rather poisons & contaminates it. (Self-sterilized Celtic sea salt, Grain & Salt Society brand, is the only type I use, particularly the more expensive Flower Of The Ocean variety. It is almost impossible to add too much of this variety to any food whereas similar amounts of added white table & refined salt will quickly ruin the taste. I have not yet found another reliable "sea salt" brand, and I don't get free salt or one cent for saying this.)

Perhaps somewhere between an estimated 2-5% and another estimated 33% of people may (or may not) be sensitive to high sodium levels, but that is basically irrelevant (when 100% are told to avoid it) & could be solely an allergic reaction, reaction to contaminants, a kidney malfunction, etc. More important is the presence of all the necessary minerals starting with the major ones - sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, zinc, copper, selenium, chromium, etc. (in their proper balance). Actual salt is very alkalinizing and is only 84% sodium chloride whereas white salt is 98% or more sodium. The real thing also contains an abundance of trace minerals lacking in the normal diet and is extremely nutrient (mineral) dense. Any deficiency of an essential nutrient, mineral especially, will artificially shorten lifespan and accelerate aging & killer disease. In addition to this, several of the rarer minerals in Celtic sea salt have a proven effect on dramatically increasing at least the average lifespan of both microbes and mice (although it is not the optimal source, it is "a" source unlike the conventional diet). (Sea salt is not to be eaten unsterilized. Sterilization is by heat, but colloidal silver, or possibly [least reliable] olive leaf extract can have a strong effect although some pathogens may remain.) The attack on sodium & salt, like that on dietary cholesterol and the theory of heart attacks caused by blockages of arteries (see below), is a classic case of the creation of problems where none exist, or more accurately, the creation of problems / overuse of "active imaginations" where none need exist on top of the prior problem-causing.

The most common early signs of sodium deficiency are lack of energy, soreness, digestive problems, and specifically heat stroke / profuse sweating, exploding cells, and death. Farmers feed salt blocks to their animals to prevent them from dying prematurely (possibly with symptoms of abnormal blood pressure and heart problems) because they have a vested interest in keeping them alive and "out of a doctor's office": the animals do not develop high blood pressure and neither do humans (vast majority of) as a result of salt / sodium intake.

It Does Not Matter How Genuinely Stupid The Misdirection Is

ANY misdirection / creation of medical problems where none exist can be used to make money because it creates disease, and diseases (really symptoms) "need" immediate treatment. What happens after symptoms appear is akin to a panic attack on the part of the sufferer - especially if he runs to his conventional M.D. / hospital and then follows their advice: although action needs taken immediately, then is not the time to "figure out what to do" let alone follow advice blindly. The time for developing "battle plans" that focus on far more than mere prevention is long before the disease sets in. In such a situation, there is typically not time to question, fathom, or even identify all the misdirections taking place, and the speed of the process is the reason the misdirections can continue and so many can easily (profitably) be trapped.

- cholesterol restriction in the diet (meat, eggs, dairy, butter, etc.) has no rational or scientific basis for 90-100% of the populous: butter in huge amounts may be bad, but not for cholesterol - for its potentially huge selenium content. Selenium actually (greatly) prevents both heart disease & some cancers but overdoses can be toxic. Cholesterol is an essential nutrient. Not only are essential fatty acids necessary, but cholesterol is also necessary to prevent a deficiency disease. More to the point is the role of homocysteine, homogenization of dairy products, mercury fillings, dental problems, contaminants in the diet, nutritional deficiencies, absence of antioxidants, and especially thyroid function & allergies.

The original studies used to propagate the cholesterol "witch hunt" were done in rabbits in the early 1900's. Rabbits were fed an unnatural very high cholesterol intake, and it was "found" that blood cholesterol skyrocketed. This "finding" was used (by others) to then justify reduction of cholesterol intake in humans.

Humans it happens, like rats, naturally ingest cholesterol. They are not vegetarians - like the rabbit. Only the rabbit's liver was unable to detoxify the overload of artificially induced cholesterol poisoning. There could be no / is no such poisoning in man whose liver has developed from a non-vegetarian diet to handle such cholesterol intake. A small segment may be sensitive to cholesterol or type of fat due to a clogged liver (which can be easily declogged - see Clark; also it could be due to a simple nutritional deficiency and failure to follow even the words of Dr. Atkins when on his diet). And a small segment may simply be even allergic to cholesterol despite traditional allergy propaganda. But both problems are irrelevant to heart disease. Like electro-medical "remissions" of cancer & infections, both the inability to poison humans with dietary cholesterol and the real cause (or at least valid treatment) of heart attacks were widely known in the earlier part of the 1900's. [See ___ _____ below.] (These were known before various people were given enough opportunity to inject enough sheer laziness / mysticism into them to "make each look bad" & hence "ruin" them for the general population causing millions of deaths).

Notable however is the documented 50%+ diagnosis M.D. error rate coupled with the fact historically deaths have been attributed to heart attacks like actions blamed on "little green men" often without adequate autopsy. Thus, at least in the past, the possibility exists up to 65% of all deaths otherwise attributed to heart attacks could not only be doctor-caused or self-caused by other means but literally conjured up by "active imaginations" who want to attribute them to the current or relevant socially-acceptable "disease war". (The "disease war" changes periodically but is always waged against whatever gets the most grants, donations, academic / "research" jobs, public acceptance, and gives the most people "something to do" in the most "perceived efficient" manner possible. Sometimes it may be heart disease, other times AIDS, other times cancer, etc.)

- exercise is irrelevant to heart disease & lifespan & will - not may - just like prescription drugs & doctors - dramatically increase the chances of heart disease & artificially shortened lifespan if it is used to ignore / replace / rationalize simple nutrition & the separate therapies identified in these reports. Of course increased protein intake and anti-oxidants are necessary for heavy exercise.

- studies used to "see what people want to see" & popularize vegetarianism when vegetarians generally have less healthy blood and do not live as long as meat eaters even with B-12 supplementation (ultra-darkfield microscopy, see Atkins, Wallach). On top of nutrients naturally missing from vegetarian food choices, the biggest problem with vegetables & fruits is lack of nutrients - by the time they arrive on the supermarket shelves where consumers buy them, they have lost most of their nutrients in the time it takes to get there and from the inadequate growing process used / time picked. And all this is again on top of the depleted growing soils used that were documented by official U.S. government sources as running out of minerals, again, in the 1930's.

Further, studies by various people have found organically-grown fruits and vegetables beneficial to the human body whereas mass-produced fruits and vegetables not organically grown both "dead" and harmful. (Under high-powered microscopes capable of viewing living organisms without killing them as the "mass-marketed" electron microscope does. Also, malonate, a profound immune-suppressing substance, not good for any disease whether cancer or heart, is found in many fruits & vegetables not organically grown: it is linked to pesticide use.)

- garlic is now said to have no benefit on blood cholesterol (not that there was ever a valid need to lower it) by the same people who use it like aspirin - the Germans: previous studies "promoting" garlic's blood cholesterol lowering effects are now called, in the words of the researchers themselves, "flawed". What those who rely on the media & pill-pushers don't yet know is garlic is known to kill or disable large amounts of brain cells similar to alcohol (see Beck), & it should be regarded as deadlier than sugar or caffeine. The fact that its selenium & germanium & maybe other compounds are beneficial to cancer & infections is irrelevant to dramatically diminished brain function (especially with raw garlic). And similar effects may occur with onions and leaks. If selenium, germanium, etc. are desired, they should not be consumed in the form of garlic, onion, or leaks.

- enough autopsies of fatal heart attack victims have existed for decades to dispel the myth that the fundamental cause is arterial obstruction. Despite the fact this was documented numerous times (again) beginning in the 1930's, bypass and similar heart / artery surgeries have continued unfettered on a wide scale because they are what can be sold to the public. (This means profitably.) The fundamental cause is an acidic condition of the heart muscle. Almost universally, disease occurs in an acidic environment. Numerous therapies turn acidic into alkaline states including ionized water, simple mineral supplementation, peroxide / ozone / oxygen, and others. One of the most effective therapies known for the heart muscle specifically however is an obscure but powerful herb used in Germany virtually unknown elsewhere: Strophanthin. This is not even the best documented method to prevent / treat heart disease, but it's a good one: it completely prevented deaths due to heart attacks in 15,000+ heart patients over 2 decades (it should not be taken without a full understanding of its effects).

These same routine context drops go on even more widely with more easily "controllable" drugs. When results are not as wanted & cannot be easily "fiddled" away, "the placebo effect" is cited as the favorite excuse of the approval / external funding seeking M.D. (e.g. as to why a non-drug, non-FDA approved substance worked, etc.). This is patently irrational as explained above since often there is no "control" other than a widely allergic substance & ill-understood color therapy is secretly being employed. This is the same as calling cancer remissions "spontaneous" - as if they occurred by chance (or because "God made it so") simply because those doing the name-calling need to ignore the actual cause of the remission.

Studies showing results of all available rational therapies are not widely reported or even "financed" - only of ones with a "reason" & support / rationalization structure firmly in place are popularized. The irony is that as of 1998, the most useful therapies do not even make it into the running for most studies and if they are studied they are probably refused publication. Certainly publishing even one "good" one would anger other advertisers / sponsors / an entire industry & possibly create a "new" trade journal after support is pulled "overnight" by a billion U.S. dollar a week industry. This unnatural situation occurred 'partly' "by accident" - it wasn't counted on that drugs & pills were inferior to safer more effective therapies & that simple oxygen, nutrients, & electrical stimulation were even far more effective & far safer than drugs, approval-endorsed therapies & patentable-approaches. Patents & approval rely on force-backed governments to "grant" them & therein lies the original "broken link in the chain" of (white-collar hoax) reasoning & basis for the entire problem. The desire to maintain instead of build & resulting need to rationalize / cause problems instead of solve them naturally incorporated irrational, destructive, force-backed government agencies in the logical extension of its plan. Its (the whole industry's) whole premise is therefore invalid (forcing individuals to do what they want), it is fundamentally flawed, & this is easily proven by the fact that far more can be done by oneself, on oneself, at home for virtual no cost than a myriad of doctors, hospitals, etc. can do for the same condition. This does not mean that such properly used (& rendered) services are not necessary at some point for something however. (Disclaimer: this does not mean the research information available here is to be used as a substitute for any needed medical advice, treatment, diagnosis, or training.)

The average M.D.'s confusion of the statistical with the individual & his own rampant conclusion- jumping can be widely, easily seen by anyone having spent enough time "consulting" this type. Published "every-colleague-knows" studies are "interpreted" (often like they are in Chinese) as pre-packaged effortless "reasons" for things to happen / diseases to occur / money to come in for "the practice". Such studies are "interpreted" & performed "for a reason" - typically with those people / entities "with a reason" for the studies to be so interpreted / performed somehow involved in the studies themselves. When no immediate "reason" for interpreting a study's results a certain way exists for the average M.D., the media, & trade union journals, the "see whatever we collectively want to see" behavior is employed. (Perceived strength of opinion / justification is found in numbers.) Such published studies are social / economic / political entities in nature and exist for the purpose of setting up a simple external authority to control the masses who default on the proper rational use of the mind.

By definition, such published studies have no necessary relation to real, valid research. The more mysticism-free & valuable the research, the less it can be subjected to such ploys to control / "interpret" it, & hence the less it is / can be published. Thus, the studies published in trade union journals visible to the public looking towards them as external authorities, while better than the "science" of the Dark Ages of Europe, are by nature the least valuable (to the individual's health & lifespan) & are akin to stale leftovers. In the context of rational therapies properly studied, there is the same difference between such published studies & private or unpublished studies as there is in the standard of living in a socialist society vs. a capitalist society. Not many people would want to live in a "peoples' republic" when they can live in the U.S.. Yet these same people prefer to be guided by published studies more than do the simple research necessary to identify the rational therapies mentioned in these reports & then conduct their own blood analysis under a microscope / otherwise "test" the effects of such "unpublished" therapies on the only ones that count - themselves.

Heart Disease Not a Killer - The Creation of Problems / Industries Where None Need Exist Is

Based on published studies, no less than & probably well over 90% of all heart attacks are & have been entirely preventable since the early 1900's - with a single therapy (this one still happens to be a pill). (Limiting carbohydrates / Atkins is not the answer to heart disease although it has a lesser more indirect beneficial effect and can be "a" treatment.) Combining this with other more known but unrelated pills & easy therapies could certainly bring that figure to virtually 100%. And it has been known since then that exercise, smoking, "stress", diet, fat / cholesterol intake, & weight reduction were totally irrelevant to these heart disease successes. Even the "cholesterol tangent" was exposed in a mass-marketed book written by a very astute & capable M.D. for the lay reader in the mid 1970's: virtually no one wanted to see it or knows of its existence today [a now out of print book as many good ones tend to become quickly in medicine, but you may still be able to find a copy]. [See ___ _____ below.]

The goal was & is not the elimination or successful treatment of heart disease; the goal is the job "creating" / time occupation / grant collecting "study" of it - to go on "searching", prescribing, book-writing, & engaging in popular opinion. And this neocheating is easy to accept by the populous: exercise, eating "right", blaming eggs until it becomes socially-unacceptable to do so, cooking olive & polyunsaturated vegetable oils [a form of suicide], consuming other toxic vegetable oils even unheated, using margarine, going on "Mediterranean diets", etc. makes people feel good, let's them be part of a crowd, gives them their politician's & doctor's (& paperback book author's) approval (how can all that be wrong?), let's them think exercise cures or is rationally helpful for disease, & overall gives them something to do. "Something to do" until they develop arteriosclerosis, cancer, or most prevalent in heavy exercisers, whether rats or humans, premature aging & oxidative stress (especially noticeable as wrinkles, decreased mineral levels, & a shortened life) as a direct result of ignoring (even widely published) Reality. The whole view of modern heart disease treatment, even "alternative" can be regarded as one big (obvious) "misinterpretation" once the studies from the early 1900's onwards are read in their proper context. Such a "misinterpretation" while convenient cannot rationally be regarded as unintentional, whether by conscious or unconscious design [see below discussions of published statistics / popular studies and unscientific "interpretation" thereof].

[Heart disease and cancer, like AIDS & infectious disease can just as easily afflict young adults as those in old age homes - the fact they don't seem to is a mere statistic related to their cause, and as far as the individual is concerned, cannot be reliably applied to him/her. The greater time exposed to the same conditions of cause however, the greater the chance of contracting the diseases; some people develop them later in life, others can die of them earlier. These are not related to the basic process of aging even though they may increase in frequency given a sizable enough sample of people the older the sample gets. It is vitally necessary to any individual's BI (biological immortality) / lifespan extending therapy to eliminate, not just lessen the chances of contraction by the usual 25-50+%, such killer & debilitating diseases although this cannot be considered the method that will extend actual maximum lifespan or intervene in the aging process.]'

End Lifespan Report quotes.

Ultimate Chemical Protocol For Heart & Related Disease

(Not to be confused with the Master Protocol
or electro-medicine)

- again, in the right dosage, under the supervision of a knowledgeable M.D. -

Like Strophanthin, seemingly around 90-100% effective against heart disease is ______. Combining these two therapies while correcting deficiencies provides what is very close to the ultimate chemical protocol for heart & related disease. (Actually, there is another chemical substance revealed in the Master Protocol that I would consider essential in heart / artery / blood vessel disease; combining these four therapies makes for the surest thing possible from chemical substances and provides greatly increased / normalized energy and breathing ability. Profound elimination of fatigue and vastly increased energy, no matter the heart condition, are among the first things I expect from adding this fourth chemical therapy and/or the electro-medical aspects of the Master Protocol).

The catch is, normal ____ tests (and doctors in general) are useless in themselves. This was found in the 1940's by an M.D. when heart disease was "new" and before doctors were "trained" in the prevailing dogma regarding it. The M.D. was simply interested in keeping his patients healthy and discovered this "side benefit" by "accident". No heart attacks were seen in his practice during 13 years of ____ therapy. In the 1970's he wrote a now out of print book about his clinical experiences with over 1500 patients entitled "______", by _____, M.D., Ph.D. (Copies have been made available from _____.) It also exposed the cholesterol / egg / meat scares, exercise, smoking, drinking and diet propaganda and polyunsaturated fats for what they were long before the media began to catch on.

Below normal body temperature, as it diagnoses insufficient thyroid function / Wilson's Syndrome is one warning sign of cardiovascular disease later in life. Another warning sign is high blood cholesterol - BUT elevated blood cholesterol has nothing to do with diet and is a result of insufficient _____. Normalization of body temperature seems to be required and this probably means, as _____, ______. ______[normal accepted version of medication used today] do not work; they are incomplete and do not supply what is required for these effects. Very few M.D.'s are aware of this: in addition to strophanthin, correction of the acidic condition of the cardiovascular system directly attributable to insufficient _____ is an absolutely essential "very serious consideration" for those with ANY sign of heart / artery disease, high blood pressure, ______ or ____ conditions.

Again we see these results with heart and artery disease were obtainable in the1940's and even marketed to the lay person in paperback form 23 years ago.

See also Clark's "Cure For All Diseases" book and "The Fully-Integrated Answer To Disease, Part I" on ____ syndrome. The information therein can also help ____ return to normal. Ridding the body and ____ of pathogens and altering the biological terrain / eliminating pollutants that cause ____ damage is thought to be able to return _____ function to normal (see Clark, use of Beck's devices as modified in the Master Protocol and other devices identified therein are optimal and may be absolutely required either without ___ medication or in developed / end stage cases).

If you rely on _____ medication (probably polluted as per Clark), you may have to take it for life - even going off it for a few weeks to months may be dangerous. Correct dosage and gradual increases / decreases are also critical. If ____ function can be restored to (better than) normal using electro-medicine alone without prescription _____ medication, all the better. But ______ must be restored to safely eliminate the threat of death from cardiovascular disease.

Many other conditions are relieved with restoration of _____ (infections, immunity, fatigue, lack of energy, anxiety, depression, etc. - the whole list of them mentioned in connection with _____ in "The Fully-Integrated Answer To Disease, Part I").

... [If you have the Master Protocol, there is a method identified there for use at home by the lay person that has repeatedly stopped heart attacks cold in progress; this is even more valuable than the ___ technique mentioned here, and is a necessity for both the heart patient and anyone living with them. Unfortunately, hospitals, doctors, emergency rooms, and first aid manuals are absolutely useless for this and cannot be relied on to even identify it to those dying of heart disease.]...

Click here for the Master Protocol Description

• The Fully-Integrated Answer To Disease, Part I - including Cancer, AIDS, Infectious Disease Remissions (total, lasting, proven, anything but "by chance") - report excerpts & contents
  
  
  
• Neo-Tech Lifespan: Up To 50-100+ Years Added To Your Life & Aging Slowed - Now - With Present Technology - report excerpts & contents
  
  
  
• Master (Ultimate) Protocol (all disease & aging) - The Fully-Integrated Answer To Disease, Part II - description
  
  
  
  • My Blood Cells Live 8 Times Longer Under the Microscope Than They're "Supposed To" (8 Times Longer and In Extreme Health) - How Long Do Yours Live?
    
    
    
• Your Own Working Free-Energy Machine